Tasmanian tiger too weak to hunt sheep

Share |  

Tasmanian tigers had skulls too weak to hunt much more than possums, according to new research.

TASMANIAN TIGERS WERE INNOCENT of the crime that led many hunters to send them to extinction in the early 20th century, a study has revealed.

The iconic thylacine was mercilessly persecuted for allegedly killing sheep. But new research shows the carnivorous marsupial had jaws too weak to tackle anything much larger than a possum.

Scientists believe the thylacine's inability to take down larger prey, together with loss of habitat, largely contributed to its downfall. The paid hunters who went gunning for the animal only finished what nature had started.

"Our research has shown that its rather feeble jaw restricted it to catching smaller, more agile prey," says Dr Marie Attard, from the University of New South Wales (UNSW). "That's an unusual trait for a large predator like that, considering its substantial thirty-kilogram body mass and carnivorous diet. 

1869. Thylacine shot by Weaver.   LAUNCH GALLERY

Tasmanian tiger bark worse than its bite

"As for its supposed ability to take prey as large as sheep, our findings suggest that its reputation was at best overblown. While there is still much debate about its diet and feeding behaviour, this new insight suggests that its inability to kill large prey may have hastened it on the road to extinction."

The findings appear in the Journal of Zoology, published on Thursday by the Zoological Society of London.

Thylacines, nicknamed Tasmanian tigers, once ranged across Australia and Papua New Guinea but were confined to Tasmania by the time Europeans settled in the region. Loss of habitat and prey, and the bounty paid to hunters to kill them, have been blamed for the thylacines' extinction.

Despite its decline the thylacine did not receive official protection from the Tasmanian government until two months before the last known specimen died at Hobart Zoo on September 7, 1936.

Thylacine too weak to hunt big prey

The scientists measured stress patterns in the skulls of a thylacine and two of Australasia's largest remaining marsupial predators, the Tasmanian devil and the spotted-tailed quoll. Of the three, the thylacine skull was by far the most stressed in response to simulations of struggling prey and tearing and pulling bites.

"By comparing the skull performance of the extinct thylacine with those of closely related, living species we can predict the likely body size of its prey," says Dr Stephen Wroe, director of UNSW's Computational Biomechanics Research Group. "We can be pretty sure that thylacines were competing with other marsupial carnivores to prey on smaller mammals, such as bandicoots, wallabies and possums."

"Especially among large predators, the more specialised a species becomes the more vulnerable it is to extinction. Just a small disturbance to the ecosystem, such as those resulting from the way European settlers altered the land, may have been enough to tip this delicately poised species over the edge."

RELATED ARTICLES
Death of the last Tasmanian tiger
Tassie tiger pelt bought for $5 at garage sale
More funding needed for thylacine genome
Thylacine hunted more like a cat than a dog
Tasmanian tiger brought to life
Tasmanian tiger gallery
Searching for the Tasmanian tiger in PNG
Aussie carnivores weird and wonderful

Rate this Article
Average Rating:
5 stars
Share |  
If you'd like to comment on this article, please log in or register with Australian Geographic - we'd love to hear your opinion.

Comments 9

  • These are interesting findings, but they seem contrary to everything I have seen and learned about the thylacine over a lifetime of living in proximity to the creature. Our family have a history of this creature, beginning with my father catching one back in the 1930's here in the south west of WA. This began a lifetime fascination for him, and of course the rest of us. We have sightings here every year, and at this time of the year, hear them screaming as they go searching for a mate. Only this week I have walked the same path as the thylacine and photographed massive footprints that can only belong to an animal OTHER than a cat or dog. I have seen the fresh prints on several mornings.
    Report

     
  • Having said that, one of the trademark signs of a kill by this creature is the head being chew off. Although I have not examined a thylacines skull and jaw as your experts have, it appears they have a very large jaw span and this must be for some reason. Whenever they have taken a small animal or kangaroo on this or other properties, one of the first things we have documented is the damage done to the head of the deceased prey. This creature always crushed the skull or chews the head in a manner that no other predator does. This does not sound like an animal with a weakness in its jaw.
    Report

     
  • My family have been documenting sightings, tracks, kills etc for the past 50 years and it is only when the marsupial wolf is present that we get these trademark signs on the kill.....
    I just thought I would comment as the whole subject is fascinating and although I firmly believe it is the same creature we are dealing with here in western australia, perhaps evolution has altered its abilities from those of thylacines studied in tasmania. Report

     
  • The animal may have had a weaker bite than previously thought but that does not mean it could not kill a sheep. Thylacines were pursuit predators hunting prey over long distances. Anyone who has chased a sheep over a long distance will know that eventually they will lie down and give up (especially merinos). This would obviously make a sheep relatively easy to kill. Report

     
  • I also heard this story on the radio with the researchers claiming that a thylacine wouldn't be able to pull down a 90kg sheep with this bite force. Firstly a 90kg sheep is either a ram or a british breed ewe, merino sheep which are the majority of the flock in tasmania only reach a mature ewe weight of about 60-65kg. Fine wool saxon merino ewes only reach a mature weight of 45-50kg. Tasmania is known for its fine wool. Furthermore at least 100 years of breeding has gone into the sheep of today since thylacine times. If sheep today are conservatively 5kg heavier (through improved genetics), then mature age saxon ewes would have weighed only 40kg. Report

     
  • It takes lambs about two years to reach mature weight. If a lamb grew 10kg every six months until maturity at two years of age then it would have spent 18 months of the first two years of its life weighing less than a thylacine (30kg). Combine this with the tendancy of merino sheep to just lie down and give up after being chased for an extended period of time then thylacines would have been well and truly able to predate on sheep flocks. The research tells us what bite force and stress the thylacine skull would have been able to cope with however assuming that the thylacine couldn't kill sheep is just plain dumb and wrong as they haven't taken into account the hunting method of the animal, or the physical attributes of the prey. Report

     
  • Ms Attard has apparently failed to take into account a wealth of hard evidence regarding the thylacine’s actual hunting methods. She rather carelessly disregards the countless field observations experienced by Tasmanian graziers and bushmen of past times as lurid myths. The thylacine was renowned far and wide for its powerful jaws as time and again this is revealed in well documented evidence, much of which was published in historical editions of the Mercury newspaper.
    Whatever scientific evidence can be obtained from skeletal material and what is actually performed by a living specimen are apparently worlds apart.
    Report

     
  • Ms Attard is therefore asserting that this prowess was a virtual impossibility due to stress levels in the tiger’s facial bone structure rendering it incapable of performing such feats. The thylacine was capable of killing an animal the size of a Bennett’s wallaby, comparable in size to a sheep, while its preferred prey was undoubtedly the smaller pademelon. While it would have occasionally dined on smaller fare, it must also be remembered that the tiger was well equipped to tackle much larger prey, and the fact that nature endowed this animal with such an enormous gape strongly suggests this, and not as Ms Attard suggests, merely to intimidate. It was an attribute used to perfection. Report

     
  • The thylacine killed by crushing and smothering its prey, this enhanced by its capability to come down hard on the head and neck area. To enable it to perform this action, the thylacine was blessed with a specially reinforced zygomatic arch, the bone structure that protects the driving muscles and which is attached to the upper jawbone. While it is true that it dined mainly on soft tissue and offal, the animal had, nevertheless, the distinct ability to take advantage of the gifts nature had provided. The sad fact remains that hypothetical revelations such as that of Ms Attard and certain of her peers are being made when the horse has all but bolted and are at best somewhat fanciful. Report

     

Latest Articles

Advertisement

Australian Geographic Galleries

  • Most Popular

  • Most Recent

Around Australia!

Discover Australia's natural treasures with our interactive maps. Explore our most popular regions a...
View Now

AG Publications
  • Discovery Series Promo Pod
  • Books-Promo-Pod
  • All-About-Book-Series
  • nation-in-the-making-promotions-pod
  • activity-books-publications-pod

FREE EXPLORER SET!



Subscribe to or renew your AUSTRALIAN GEOGRAPHIC subscription and receive this five piece Explorer Set FREE!



FREE EXPLORER SET VALUED AT $69.95

This five-piece set will prove indispensable on your next bushwalk or camping trip. Features include: • Binoculars – 2.3 - 2.7X magnification • Stainless steel multi tool • Lightweight torch • 500ml drinking bottle • Compass key ring • Lightweight pouch with adjustable shoulder strap and exterior belt loops • Size: 15cm (l) x 14cm (h) x 10cm (d)