Brisbane floods: did the dams work?

Share |  

As Brisbane cleans up its murky waters, the community wonders how well the dams worked.

NOW THAT BRISBANE'S FLOODWATERS are receding and the long clean up begins, considerations are turning to just how well the city's infrastructure and systems handled the disaster.

The Wivenhoe Dam has played a central role in managing the massive water flow into the Brisbane River catchment area, and therefore, to urban areas.

From lessons learned after the 1974 flood, the dam - built in 1984 and located some 80 km upstream from Brisbane - was constructed to mitigate future severe floods and prevent smaller ones.

"If were not for Wivenhoe, we would have faced flooding the likes of which we cannot comprehend," Brisbane Mayor Campbell Newman says.

Managing the dam water

According the managing authority, SEQ Water Grid Manager, the Wivenhoe dam was designed to reduce the level of a 1974-sized flood by 2 m. Given this flood's peak of 4.46 m (1 m less than 1974), without the dam, the river would have risen much higher, inundating many more areas.

"The flood storage and gates and spillways are designed to deal with floods much more extreme than what we've seen," says Dan Spiller, director of operations at SEQ Water Grid Manager. "What this [latest flood] has shown is just how the dam is supposed to operate."

The full capacity of the dam is 225 per cent, with 100 per cent referring to storage of the region's drinking water supply and the excess above that meant for flood storage. The additional water is released in amounts and times that are manageable for the river system and its downstream towns. This is done closely in conjunction with information from the Bureau of Meterology.

At 200 per cent, the dam's five gates start to become overwhelmed and the water is forced out through overflow valves. If the reservoir tops 225 per cent, the water simply spills over the top of the dam into the valley below.

Just three years ago, the dam's reservoir bottomed out at 17 per cent at the height of a prolonged drought. With months of intense rains, brought about by a strong La Niña, and recent heavy rains, the water deluged up to 1 million megalitres (ML), twice that of Sydney Harbour, each day over a few days prior to the flood, forcing the dam up to a peak of 190 per cent, Dan says. "And we were able to catch that and release it in a much more controlled way." 

Preparing the dams for more floods

The inundation to the catchment area was such that nothing was going to prevent a severe flood. But the dam provided the ability to slow the flow down, Dan says.

In a blessing from Mother Nature, clear skies have spared time for the dam to play catch-up, allowing the dam authority to steadily decrease its reserve in controlled releases.

"What we're trying to do is empty [the dams] now in seven days," says Dan, to shore up rooom for any more floods that may be on the way. And with experts predicting the La Niña to hang around until March, it's a possibility that Brisbane is taking seriously.

RELATED ARTICLES
Qld flood: did the dams work?
Personal perspective: inside the flood clean up
World's first live flood test yields vital data
Queensland floods unprecedented
Kangaroo boom follows QLD floods
Water quality concerns plague Queensland
Predict weather without a forecast
Tracking cyclones in Australia
WA town hit by cyclone-related tornado
Earthquakes: 10 biggest in history
10 most destructive tsunamis in history
Biggest cyclones in history
Timeline: Australia's worst cyclones
On this day in history: Sydney's worst hail storm
On this day: Sydney supercell hailstorm
When dust storms descend
True force of Cyclone Yasi may never be known
Tropical cyclone facts and figures
...More natural disaster stories
...More 2011 Queensland flood stories

Home to a warm climate and the crystal clear waters of the Whitsunday Islands, Queensland is a tropical paradise. Off the coast lies the Great Barrier Reef, a breathtaking coral system abounding in exotic fish and spectacular colours. The lush World Heritage-listed Daintree forest in the far north provide some relief from the heat, while further inland, the Simpson Desert’s earthy red dunes offer a stark change of scene.
Rate this Article
Your Rating:
star
Average Rating:
stars
Share |  
If you'd like to comment on this article, please log in or register with Australian Geographic - we'd love to hear your opinion.

Comments 60

  • Much of the 1974 rainfall was in the Bremer / Warrill Ck catchments, and much of the 2011 flood rain was in the Lockyer valley, which empties into the Brisbane River BELOW Wivenhoe Dam near Lowood. Although Wivenhoe Dam certainly helped mitigate inflows from the upper Brisbane River & Stanley creek, it did not / would not mitigate inflow from other catchments emptying into the river below the dam. Report

     
  • Chris,

    Any substantial reduction in flow from Wivenhoe into the Brisbane River reduces the river height at the point of confluence with the Bremmer. This leads to a meaningful reduction in the height the Bremmer upstream (think Ipswich). If Wivenhoe wasn't there, then the Bremmer would have been greater than 21m+ at Ipswich and 5.5m+ in Brisbane.
    Report

     
  • But I will also say one last thing. Wivenhoe could have played an even more important role had authorities let it fall to 60-70% in the knowledge the rains and torrents were coming rather than the 110-120% they seemed to follow. It's something that other authorities (with experience) do. I think SEQ Water will have learned plenty from this experience and will modify their protocol surrounding this. Report

     
  • But if SEQ Water had released the water you can guarantee they would have been criticised for 'wasting' the water. Its a no-win situation these days with so many experts about. I think the quesiton should be less about how we try to manage nature and more about how we adapt to living with it - i.e. if we're relying on dams to protect single story homes on floddplains then we'll end up with a true disaster of epic proportions one day and it could easily be in Brisbane, Ipswich or the Gold Coast Report

     
  • Interesting comments. If they had reduced the dam to 60% or 70% when would they have done it? The Bremer and Brisbane were higher than normal just after Christmas. Don't forget that Moogerah Dam has been overflowing for more than a month into the Bremer catchment. To have reduced the dam successfully to 70% they would have had to have done it during November. Vic you are correct people would have criticised the authorities at that time. Report

     
  • water restrictions vs flood damage, take your pick Report

     
  • Clearly too much water was kept in the damn
    Put another way, if the same down poor occurred when the damn was at 20-100% the Brisbane river would have never flooded. As the dam would have been able to hold the water so it could have been released on our terms not natures. The water now sitting in that dam has cost all of us dearly. If we learn from this only time will tell.





    Report

     
  • If you know you have an additional 20% of inflow coming over 48 hours due to rains falling in the catchment upstream, you can start reducing the level immediately. You are not putting at risk the 100% level of the dam, merely understanding that with a level of 80% and a further 20% upstream you will have 100% capacity once the waters arrive. They seemed to consistently keep the dam at 110% and reduced water the same as inflow (until the massive rains at the ranges near Toowoomba). Report

     
  • The need for water is increasing every year and we live in the driest continent on the planet. We should be looking long term to capture this precise resource to cover for periods of years not months. If larger and more dams need to be created to maintain our quality of life as well as preventing flooding action needs to be taken now. Bad planning has created our cities and towns to be built on flood plains so what choice do we have. Report

     
  • Quote " Bad planning has created our cities and towns to be built on flood plains so what choice do we have."
    Cities and towns globally are historically built on flood plains,that is where the rivers are.
    Shipping was and still is the predominant mode of goods transport, no river, no ships, no trade. Report

     
  • A lot of these people that were more interested in frogs than worrying about their homes. These no doubt will be the first in line for money from the Flood Fund. Report

     
  • Independent expert studies in the next few weeks and ultimately a Royal Commission will confirm that SEQWater reacted too slowly to the BoM forecast of an extreme rain event in SE Qld. Had they released amounts now being released (around 300,00ML/day causing less than minor flooding downstream) from 9am on the Friday (when forecast became reality) instead of waiting till Monday then releasing a further 640,000ML/day for 15 hours on Tuesday, this disaster would have been avoided. Report

     
  • Fred,
    Just a note, while it was all part of the one weather system, it was not the down pour at Toowoomba that caused the massive inflows into Wivenhoe. It was the predicted consistent rainfall in the upper catchments of the Stanley over a few days and then the deluge over Wivenhoe itself on Monday night and Tuesday morning that sent SEQWater into a panic. By then with previous low discharges, it was too late to avert flooding disaster. Report

     
  • I guess alot of things could of been done differently in hindsight but in a country where we are in drought one minute and then have surplus water the next it is very hard to predict what might happen. Mother Nature has a habit of hitting us hard when we least expect it. Report

     
  • Some of you have commented that they should have released the water "in the knowledge that the rains were coming". Are the releases from Wivenhoe going to be governed on reports from the Bureau of Meteorology? What if the rains did not eventuate? 18 months ago Wivenhoe sat at 20%. Another factor that contributed to the flood was that water restrictions should have been completly lifted back in October when the dam passed 100%. Report

     
  • The Wivenhoe Dam has not prevented a serious flood which has caused billions of dollars in damage. It just made the flood a little less serious and little less costly. After the 1974 floods the Brisbane city Government and the State Government went for the politically easy option of building a dam. They avoided politically difficult but necessary urban planning and development controls. Report

     
  • The dams in grid 3, Wivenhoe, Somerset and North Pine have been kept at or near 100% since March 2010. Going into what everyone predicted was going to be wet summer, at these levels was poor planning at it's worst. The inundation of Brisbane to save Wivenhoe could have been averted, the government could have let it drop to 70-80% and still have a full dam at the end of Summer. Report

     
  • What we have here is a classic conflict between the Green brigade ("Never build another dam on a river" - see their website) and the sensible brigade.
    What actually makes me more angry is the ever-increasing price of water from the new spun-off Urban Utilities and the like. After they spent $63 million on new offices. We now have MORE than enough water - but I wouldn't be placing bets on the price of water going down any time soon! Report

     
  • Raise the height of the wall at Wyvenhoe and fire the current water "experts", or this will happen again for sure. Report

     
  • Wivanhoe has approx 100% of additional storage for flood mitigation, how come only approximately 85% of the flood storage was used and why did they reduce the level of the dam just prior to the peak of the flood in the Bremmer?(see BOM levels) an effective flood storage should utilise 100% of the flood storage not 85%.... my thoughts would be to let the dam get to the first fuse plug/overflow and then manage the gates to maintain the level....this way you maximise the flood mitigation potential of the dam. Report

     
  • Kano, if the flood compartment of Wivenhoe got to 100%, the flow down the river becomes uncontrollable. Just look at the Fairbairn Dam when Emerald & Rockhampton got flooded. Once it reached 100% the water went uncontrolled down the Nogoa River. One person said the water was metres over the spillway. Wivenhoe does have an overflow, however if that goes over the release is uncontrolled. Report

     
  • wivenhoe's water storage capacity should never have been allowed to reach 100%. the Premier should have eased water restrictions as promised when the dams reached virtually 60% in may 2009:

    18 May 2009: Dam levels bring two-year buffer on water restrictions
    http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/dam-le...

    Report

     
  • i have feeling this will happen again - as it 1975? -correct me if wrong? - however its not as 'simple' as raising the wall? - why not tidal gates like river thames...london or leeves...- for sure it must be one of the reasons why homes were built on stilts...? not just air flow. Report

     
  • i certainly hope that the 'powers' don't believe all our water worries are forgotten, only 17% full 3 yrs ago - drought will bring this country to its knees quicker than floods...build more dams - i'm a greenie but sometimes they go too far - proper fire breaks need to be put in place (like they have in africa!! ) so it stops fires marching & build more dams. Report

     
  • Send it our way! We're always happy to have water! Report

     
  • Damned if they do, damned if they don't. Report

     
  • Hi Neil, I should have clarified further, the dam operators should be able to know what inflows they are experiencing through the various gauges throughout the catchment. Given this, they should be able to manage the releases based on the available storage and the predicted inflows. The purpose of the flood storage is to "chop off the peak flow and buffer the flood", this is exactly what happened. Report

     
  • The issue remains that during the event the gates were opened and the dam level dropped which may have affected the level downstream, I am confident that the authority would have a catchment model that monitors the inflows and the effect on the storage. If the storage discharges and becomes uncontrolled is irrelevant as it would have already done its job by delaying the high intensity, short duration event so it doesn't coincide with the Bremmer or Lockyer flows. Report

     
  • To South Aussie, mate we would have loved to have sent the water to South Australia and to Western Australia to put out the fires Report

     
  • Send the bill for flood to Green party . Bankrupt personally every one of them . Then make enough dams to make sure we have water for 10 years of drought till next wet season. Report

     
  • The climate is changing - as it always has and always will. Human impact on the climate is three-fifths of five-eights of SFA. Droughts end with floods. These climatic "events" are a bit more dramatic than most peoople alive today remember. Report

     
  • Doesn't anyone realise the dams have contributed to the floods! Report

     
  • Dawn
    Obviously You are living in place which was not affected by the foods.
    You should realise that role of the dam is to save lives and misery .
    This is what they do for thousand of years all over the world .
    Report

     
  • We've all become more efficient with out water usage, average 155 lt/person/day versus their target of 200 lt/person/day, that's nearly 25% better than what they want. Using these figures then we have 25% more capacity than they use in their modelling. Keep an eye on what they do with Wivenhoe's levels for the rest of this Summer and going into next Summer. Report

     
  • I know little about fluid dynamics, But that, that I do know, indicates that some of these comments have not been thought out, but are knee jerk reactions. Report

     
  • Came across this article written in March last year. So why hadn't SEQ Water been given the direction to release waters especially when this summer's extreme wet season had been predicted.
    http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/wiv... Report

     
  • Flood mitigation dams should be nearly empty in dry times and when heavy rains occur they will fill and then mitigate against flooding IF prudently managed.
    Dams for water storage are not designed or managed to mitigate against flooding.
    Water Storage Dams and the relatively recent concept, Flood Mitigation Dams are poles apart.

    Fairbairn, Paradise and Winenhoe dams, being Water Storages, did not mitigate against floods, in fact they made them worse. Report

     
  • Wivenhoe has been releasing water off and on for the last few months, flooding the communities below it. They have been critised for doing this because these people could not get out of their homes. Many residents at the time said why are they releasing the water. Now if they hadn't done the dam would have overflowed. You people who live in the city and are complaining try living in the area of Wivenhoe and Somerset Dams and maybe you will see things differently. Report

     
  • Now matter what they did at Wivenhoe we still would be flooded, if the dam wasn't there then all of that water coming into Brisbane would have been higher and uncontrollable. And how many times has the weather forecaster got it wrong and then we released the dam to 60% we would be told we were wasting water in a country that can be very dry. One thing everyone is forgetting is you can not and never will control nature. Report

     
  • I agree with Pat....the premier should have eased up on the water restrictions when the dam was full!!!! Report

     
  • Many of the issues raised are covered in the article below. (The article incorrectly states "1941". It should have been 1841.)

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/...

    Fred, in the 1974 flood, there were daily rainfalls of over 600 mm in the upper Bremer & Warrill Creek catchments, although I concede your point about the Brisbane River in flood effectively damming the Bremer where it enters the Brisbane River. Report

     
  • A couple of websites I found to illustrate rainfall patterns & flooding downstream, west, & south west of Wivenhoe Dam, areas that have no major flood mitigation storages. Notice the left arm of the Y shaped area of flooding. Wivenhoe is in the top right corner.

    http://feww.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/brsbane-f... />
    http://feww.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/east-qld-... Report

     
  • Dams can't work for flood mitigation if they are full. What idiot told them to keep the dams full,she,he or they are partly responsible for the loss of life and property. SEQ water was told not to release this water in wivenhoe dam by a higher authority. Report

     
  • I have been working on the idea : "Preventing Floods" for few years, it is now mature for deployment.
    It will prevent LOSS of LIVES , devastation of PROPERTY , cut down expenditure after Floods.
    I would like to get in touch with a relevant Government authority (or private), and work with it to make it a success.
    Report

     
  • i am shocked at the damage that has been done Report

     
  • Due to La Nina, please empty the dam to 60% NOW before it is too late again, as many of us small business will have to close and lose everything should this happen again.
    The devastation by all the people that have lost their houses and businesses is beyond comprehension. Never mind the water restrictions, nobody can afford to use water any more, and all the government assistance is a load of rubbish, they are just as bad as the insurance companies! Report

     
  • Wivenhoe was designed as a flood mitigation dam NOT a water supply dam for Brisbane. Labour and Bligh in their infinite wisdom changed that. You dont have to be einstein to know that dam was too full, it had been raining for months. I blame the government for this..they stuffed up and now have the audacity to put Wayne Goss in charge to investigate the bungle. He caused all this crap in the first place. Report

     
  • And I want to know why my house in Westlake was 1.4m higher than in 1974, when this time around we had 168mm of rainfall compared to 600+mm in 74? Wake up and smell the roses people..they stuffed up plain and simple. Why hasnt anyone asked the powers that be what Wivenhoe was built for and why it was more than 68% full. Funny how they have gone awful quiet now. Bastards!! Report

     
  • Why was the report in 2003 not acted upon which said that Wivenhoe didn't have enough flood capacity and it would take $5 milllion to $200 million dollars to improve yet the powers that be spent $3.2 billion dollars on the Clem 7 A tunnel that hardly anyone uses. Sack them all I say and get someone that knows what they are doing. Report

     
  • The Brisbane city Council should never have allowed houses to be bulit single storey in low lying areas in what has been a regular flood zone. Some houses are bellow the Brisbane river level on a good day without rain. Report

     
  • Professor Ashkanasy of course someone is to blame. Brisbane has flooded numerous times and nothing has been learned from it. What is needed is an emergency response in an emergency. But SEQ had an inflexible water release policy that said it should be kept to 110% or whatever. There is no excuse for most of what happened with the technology that is available today. Report

     
  • Continued. Why was the report in 2003 that Wivenhoe Dam didn't have enough flood capacity acted on? Was there monitoring done daily while heavy rain was falling? When the rain continued to fall was there a strategy of what to do when water levels were rising and what would be the likely effect on infrastructure? If Wivenhoe's water release is set in stone guess what? When the next big Rainfall happens history will repeat itself. Report

     
  • if we empty the dam to 60 or 75% now, what are you going to tell us in 3-5 years time when the weather patterns change again and we are in drought? Last tiem we got down to 13%. Start at 75% capacity at your peril!

    Water is a precious resource in Australia. We are the driest continent on the planet. We need to protect the security of future water supplies in times of plenty, because history shows it doesn't last. Report

     
  • Water=Life - build other dams like they wanted to years ago. Wivenhoe was never built as a water source for Brisbane - It was built to stop Brisbane Flooding!! Report

     
  • whivenhoe was not built in 1974 Report

     
  • A series of events that led up to the 1974 floods were it rained profoundly for 5 days. The total rainfall for the 5 day period from 9 am Thursday 24 January to 9 am Tuesday 29 January in the Brisbane metropolitan area ranged from 500 to 900 mm and exceeded 300 mm. Another contributing factor is that the cyclone Wanda hit just of the coast of Brisbane and caused a lot more rain , in 1974 they had not built Wivenhoe dam yet so the water had nowhere to stay so it just went through Report

     
  • Wivenhoe dam is two dams one for water supply and one for flood mitigation. When the first dam is full it is 40% of the total capacity when it is at 100% both dams are full if the 40% full section was kept at 110% of the water supply by policy then the total was 44% of the total storage leaving 56% for flooding. Do we need water to survive YES. If we only have dams for flood mitigation then maybe Traveston should have been built to stop Gympie flooding?? Report

     
  • that dam held too much water, but they had no idea that it would come Report

     
  • Now matter what they did at Wivenhoe we still would be flooded, if the dam wasn't there then all of that water coming into Brisbane would have been higher and uncontrollable. And how many times has the weather forecaster got it wrong and then we released the dam to 60% we would be told we were wasting water in a country that can be very dry. One thing everyone is forgetting is you can not and never will control nature Report

     
  • If Rudd and Goss hadn't of canned the contruction of the Wolfdene Dam in 1989 to consolidate its preference policy with the Greens, then for starters there would never have been a water shortage over the last 10 years and secondly during the time of the floods Wivenhoe could have been used solely for its intended purpose of Flood Mitigation. Lack of planning and foresight from government parties was ultimate cause of the floods. Report

     

SAVE UP TO 33% TODAY!


Subscribe or renew your subscription to Australian Geographic, with the choice of receiving an EXCLUSIVE AG UMBRELLA!



CHOOSE THE OFFER THAT SUITS YOU!

• Receive an AG umbrella with 6 issues and SAVE 22%
OR
• Receive 6 issues with no gift and SAVE 33%
The choice is yours!


 
Advertisement

E-Newsletter

Get Australian Geographic in your inbox

Sample issue


From the Video Library

Hippos in the surf

Photographers hit the beach in search of hippos in the surf for a new documentary, Africa: Eye to Eye with the Unknown.
View larger video

Facebook

Twitter

AG Publications
  • Discovery Series Promo Pod
  • Books-Promo-Pod
  • All-About-Book-Series
  • nation-in-the-making-promotions-pod
  • activity-books-publications-pod

Latest Articles