Australian Geographic to screen lost Moon footage

Share |  

Completely restored footage of the 1969 Moon landing, some of which was found in Australia, will be screened next week.

FULLY RESTORED FOOTAGE OF the historic Apollo 11 moonwalk will be shown for the first time publicly at the 2010 Australian Geographic Society Awards in Sydney on 6 October, where former astronaut Buzz Aldrin will be the guest of honour.

The video highlights of the three-hour moonwalk include a clearer picture of Neil Armstrong's descent down the stairs of the lunar module, which was taken from the Parkes Radio Observatory and the Honeysuckle Creek tracking station outside Canberra on 21 July 1969 (Australian time).

The long-forgotten video footage was uncovered during a decade-long search for the original recordings of the moonwalk, and involved lengthy detective work and clandestine meetings, says astronomer and telescope operator John Sarkissian from the CSIRO at Parkes, who headed up the search.

"We found lots of videos and things all over the place and we compiled them into a single seamless video of the whole moonwalk", John told Australian Geographic. This was then restored to clean up the degradation of the videos experienced over the past 40 years, he adds. The three-hour video has only been seen by a few veteran astronauts, including Buzz Aldrin.

Originals lost forever

At the time of the Moon landing, three stations - Goldstone in California, Honeysuckle Creek in Canberra, and Parkes in New South Wales - simultaneously recorded the events onto magnetic data tape. The direct recordings were not of broadcast quality, says John, so they had to set up a regular TV camera pointed at a small black-and-white TV screen in the observatory to obtain higher-quality images that could be relayed to television stations around the world.

"Original signals weren't HD quality TV. They weren't even broadcast quality, even by 1969 standards," he says. "They were better than what was broadcast to the world; that's why we went looking for them."

The Goldstone camera settings to convert Neil's descent down the stairs were not correct and showed an image too dark to see. So the decision was made to switch to the Honeysuckle Creek footage, and after eight minutes, to the Parkes footage, which was used for the rest of the moonwalk.

It was this clearer footage, which had not been seen since 1969, that John and his search team were hoping to recover from the NASA archives, where the tapes had been sent.

Unfortunately, they hit a roadblock. "We discovered, to our horror, that in the 1970s and 80s NASA had taken the tapes in the national archive and erased them all to record other missions."

About 250,000 tapes from the Apollo era, likely including the 45 tapes of the moonwalk, are likely lost forever, John says - "unless someone did the right thing by doing the wrong thing and took them home and put them in their garage."

Painstaking work

After some digging, they found that in the 1980s someone made a VHS tape of the Honeysuckle Creek magnetic tape, "a bootleg copy if you like, that was severely degraded," John says. A copy of that copy was given to an Apollo enthusiast who was tracked down to Sydney by the search team. This footage included a brighter and clearer version of Apollo 11 mission commander Neil Armstrong's descent to the lunar surface and was used to replace the darker Goldstone images at the start of the broadcast.

At the awards ceremony, select scenes from the entire restored video will show Neil's first step on the Moon's surface, Buzz Aldrin's decent of the lunar module ladder, the plaque reading and the raising of the US flag. The restoration took months of painstaking work as the videos had to be cleaned frame-by-frame.

John says NASA may soon release the full video. In 2009 NASA released some ditigally remastered footage of the 1969 Moon landing - but they did not include the Armstrong clip to be shown next week and then published here on the Australian Geographic web site.

About the Awards

The Australian Geographic Society funds conservation, research, adventure, exploration and community projects. The Australian Geographic Society Awards are the longest running awards for adventure in Australia and this year also marks 100 issues of the Australian Geographic journal. 

The awards bring together adventurers, scientists, conservationists and Society supporters to salute the courage and resilience of all the winners.  Award categories include: 'Lifetime of Adventure', 'Adventurer of the Year', 'Young Adventurer of the Year', 'Lifetime of Conservation', 'Conservationist of the Year', 'Young Conservationist of the Year', 'Spirit of Adventure' and 'Honorary Lifetime of Adventure'. See the 2009 winners here.

Keep track of all the latest at Australian Geographic by signing up to our newsletter or joining the AG community of Facebook.


VIDEO: A 2009 clip from NASA, below, shows part of the digitally remastered footage of Buzz. The new footage ***to be released next week***  features unseen footage of Neil Armstrong descending the stairs of the Lunar Module.

Rate this Article
Your Rating:
star
Average Rating:
stars
Share |  
If you'd like to comment on this article, please log in or register with Australian Geographic - we'd love to hear your opinion.

Comments 32

  • Can someone tell me why you can see through Buzz? Report

     
  • That's the sad part, you were alive back then and fell for it, LOL. Report

     
  • I'm no conspiracy theorist, but it looks like you can see the horizon of the moon *through* the image of Buzz (particularly the leg and arm). Is this just me? It reminds me of Star Wars film release (pre re-mastering) where the foreground was overlaid on top of the background (and only noticeable if you look very closely).

    I would really prefer to think the footage is real. If it were *faked* couldn't they have done a better job? Is there a scientific/ photographic explanation for this? Report

     
  • Not sure he's alive now. Report

     
  • I believe the transparent effect is caused by the camera. I used to work in CCTV and the old tube cameras had the problem of bright light persisting in the phosphors. I'm sure this isn't a very scientific or technically accurate explanation, but the effect is there nonetheless. This was before digital (CCD) image pickups. Report

     
  • The 'transparency' of buzz is just an artifact of the restoration process. Sorry. Report

     
  • Pause the video about 2 seconds in. The original is about 50x clearer than the "restoration". Is this a joke? The restoration looks like a blurry mess. All the detail from the suit is gone. All the detail from the moon surface is gone. Lame. Report

     
  • Confused: It's just "ghosting" caused by the recording equipment and subsequent broadcast artifacting.

    This restoration is a FAIL though. THe original has more detail. Yeah theres more "noise" but it's like in Photoshop when you use the "despeckle" filter too much. You end up with a blurry mess. Report

     
  • You can 'see through' Buzz because of the delay in the video equipment. The image of the horizon is still on vidicon tube when Buzz moves into that area. You can see this on old 80's video cameras in low light. There's also a similar delay on the type of screen used. Report

     
  • The being able to see through buzz in an artifact of the camera that was custom made to send video from the moon. The phosphors used to capture the light "remembered" what was there before, sort of like when you look at a very bright light and have an afterimage.
    The technology at the time they could not transmit normal broadcast quality video because of bandwidth limits. Think of it as trying to watch youtube on dialup. The custom made a camera that had lower resolution and and frames per second.
    Report

     
  • Then they used an "up-converter" to be able to display the nonstandard format on broadcast TV. The up-converter introduced more degradation to the picture. Most of the recordings any one has ever seen are video tapes of the up-converted content so it is not close to original quality.
    The reason the quality is so low is they have no original tapes of the data from the camera- just the up-converted content. They got lost in the bureaucracy. Report

     
  • Cudo's to Mark for the great comment!

    Ex0 - was a zero, not can't even hold that. Should we call him Mr. Negative?

    I think Mr. Moron fits precisely! Report

     
  • You have to be a retard to think that the recordings of the most important event of modern history were lost or recorded over by three seperate recording stations as well as every other point on earth that it was transmitted to and recorded again. ITS A COVER UP!
    Plus all the other tapes recorded on the moon were lost too. yeah right. Report

     
  • Then they used an "up-converter" to be able to display the nonstandard format on broadcast TV. The up-converter introduced more degradation to the picture. Most of the recordings any one has ever seen are video tapes of the up-converted content so it is not close to original quality.
    The reason the quality is so low is they have no original tapes of the data from the camera- just the up-converted content. They got lost in the bureaucracy. Report

     
  • hahaha, heheheh, did they fix the shadows? coz, shadow of rocks going one direction, and shadow of the man standing on the moon going 90 degrees to the other direction.

    How can sun light cause shadows that intersect.

    Ohh, it was a studio light dummies.
    Report

     
  • Little People - because light reflects off the earth aswell. Remember that thing called moonlight? well the earth does it too.

    Can't believe people still cling to conspiracy theories Report

     
  • Get Real: That's not what the article said. "Cover up" for what? Ah, another conspiracy that it was all faked. FYI, the astronauts left things on the moon that are still there, like mirrors that scientists bounce lasers off of to calculate the precise distance of the moon. Also, we have good enough telescopes now that you can even see the landing sites and tracks from the lunar rovers. Let's move on from the conspiracies, please! Report

     
  • It was fake. completely. Just off to the right you can see Adolf Hitler, who through Nazi time travel, and genetic regeneration, appears as a 16 year old, reflected in Buzz's helmet. The whole thing was filmed at the NAZI base in the center of the world, entered into via the secret tunnel at the north pole, via flying saucer. Report

     
  • It was fake... completely. Just off to the right you can see Adolf Hitler, who through Nazi time travel, and genetic regeneration, appears as a 16 year old, reflected in Buzz's helmet. The whole thing was filmed at the NAZI base in the center of the world, entered into via the secret tunnel at the north pole, via flying saucer. Report

     
  • 9/11 is fishy as hell , the lunar landing happened, all the evidence against it is weak. i demonstrates the general publics lack of knowledge with reguards to any photographic theory Report

     
  • If it was faked, how come noone has managed to do an effect movie that matches the real physics so closely? I mean if someone faked it, woulf they really put in all those camera faults?
    Report

     
  • To quote Alex Jones: "We have got to realize we're being conditioned on a mass scale. Start challenging this corporate slave state! The 21st Century's gonna be a new century! Not the century of slavery, not the century of lies and issues of no significance (like ****ing lame Conspiracy Theories), of classism and statism, and all the rest of the modes of control.
    We're going to get fired up about the real things, the things that matter! Creativity, and the dynamic human spirit that refuses to submit."
    Report

     
  • Well, I'm going to be at that dinner with Buzz Aldrin! Report

     
  • And another thing. The oxygen connections in the Apollo 13 Command module and Lunar lander were incompatible as they were made by two different manufacturers. On the return trip to Earth, they had to use duct tape to stick the two hoses together. Duct tape got these blokes back to Earth!! Report

     
  • Eric II. It was not the oxygen hoses that did not fit. It was the Lithium Hydroxide canisters used to remove CO2 from the cabin air that could not be shared between the Lunar Module and Command Module system. The duct tape and plastic bags and a hose were used to adapt the square CM units to the LM system. Report

     
  • You can say that again Report

     
  • Needs more Jack "twinkletoes" Schmitt Report

     
  • They need to remember to everybody, U.S. feet were there. The restoration is an excuse. But after Columbia and other successful trips: Does anybody think someone could go to the moon in those artifacts and comeback to Earth alive (in the sixties)? Report

     
  • They need to remember to everybody, U.S. feet were there. The restoration is an excuse. But after Columbia and other successful trips: Does anybody think someone could go to the moon in those artifacts and comeback to Earth alive (in the sixties)? Report

     
  • Amazed at the lack of creativity from the skeptics here. Do you really think the generation alive in 1969 never questioned moon footages? All this was discussed and more for many years.
    You don't believe we've landed on a piece of rock 225000 miles from Earth, yet you don't even doubt there are people living for years inside a piece of metal suspended in space called the International Space Station.
    Give yourselves some credit as human beings. Report

     
  • The camera used was built using the old videcon tube technology, and the tubes were very easy to "burn in". Remember that the light coming from the background was many times brighter than what you see at the beach on a bright day, and the horizon line, which was fixed by the rigid camera placement, had burned in by the time Buzz dropped down the ladder.

    Report

     
  • Anyone who doubts man (ie humankind) visited the moon should search YouTube for footage of Apollo 15 Astronauts David Scott and Jim Irwin proving Galileo's experiment on the Moon, dropping a hammer and a feather, both of which landed at the same time on the surface (due to lack of air resistance). I'm told the very clever skeptics can even use the footage to work out the mass of the moon from the time it takes the objects to fall. But I suppose they'd say it was all done with wires and smoking mirrors! Report

     

SAVE UP TO 33% TODAY!


Subscribe or renew your subscription to Australian Geographic, with the choice of receiving an EXCLUSIVE AG UMBRELLA!



CHOOSE THE OFFER THAT SUITS YOU!

• Receive an AG umbrella with 6 issues and SAVE 22%
OR
• Receive 6 issues with no gift and SAVE 33%
The choice is yours!


 
Advertisement

E-Newsletter

Get Australian Geographic in your inbox

Sample issue


From the Video Library

Hippos in the surf

Photographers hit the beach in search of hippos in the surf for a new documentary, Africa: Eye to Eye with the Unknown.
View larger video

Facebook

Twitter

AG Publications
  • Discovery Series Promo Pod
  • Books-Promo-Pod
  • All-About-Book-Series
  • nation-in-the-making-promotions-pod
  • activity-books-publications-pod

Latest Articles